Yelp.com missing the boat on RSS

So [Yelp](http://www.yelp.com) is uh, totally missing the boat on RSS.

They’ve got a [a page listing their meager RSS offerings](http://www.yelp.com/rss).

I’m not sure why they’re rolling feeds out city by city, in most systems if you’ve built in the ability to serve RSS feeds it shouldn’t need extra effort to apply that to a different set of data.

For the cities where they do have feeds, it’s rather disappointing:

Picture 1.png

You can’t get a feed of just restaurants, or just stores.

I’m not sure why they haven’t allowed users to create an RSS feed from any arbitrary search within their system. That’d allow folks to limit by content type, neighborhoods, cuisines, etc.

In this day and age it strikes me as odd that such a (shudder)Web 2.0-ish(/shudder) company would not adopt RSS thoroughly.

(I know it’s like the [pot](http://www.ajc.com) calling the [kettle](http://yelp.com) black, but I’d argue that we’ve really expanded our [RSS offerings at work](http://www.ajc.com/services/content/services/rss/index.html) and we’re trying to get better. But, hey, who would call a newspaper a (shudder)Web 2.0(/shudder) company?)

Posted in Business, Technology | Tagged | Comments Off on Yelp.com missing the boat on RSS

My favorite Web development laws

From the [great list over at Blue Flavor](http://www.blueflavor.com/blog/thinking/the_immutable_laws_of_web_design_and_development.php):

###Lister’s Law###
People under time pressure don’t think faster.

###Hofstadter’s Law###
A task always takes longer than you expect, even when you take into account Hofstadter’s Law.

Posted in Management, Programming | 2 Comments

Open Source means you can create content, right?

I know it’s a CMN but I thought this was too funny not to share:

create content | Open Source Initiative
Uploaded with plasq‘s Skitch!
Posted in Technology | Comments Off on Open Source means you can create content, right?

For journalists, it’s less about business, more about audience

[Yelvington](http://www.yelvington.com/blog/yelvington) is talking about [a bias against the business side of journalism](http://www.yelvington.com/20080203/are_journalists_antibusiness) and a class called [Business and Future of Journalism](http://cronkite.asu.edu/mcguireblog/?p=50#more-50).

I would tend to agree that too many members of the [Fourth Estate](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fourth_Estate) are phobic when it comes to dirty words like: *profit*, *return on investment*, and *revenue*.

I applaud the idea behind teaching more journalists more about the business side. Why *wouldn’t* you want to know everything there is to know about your profession — at the very least it’d make it easier for you to argue a point to management.

###If you can’t know it all, know your audience###
If you don’t have the time or the interest to learn about *everything*, then the most important thing for aspiring and practicing journalists to learn about is **the audience**.

In my limited travels it strikes me that a lot of journalists either don’t know, or don’t care about the audience research being conducted. The “don’t know” camp can be helped, but the “don’t care” camp scares me. If we’re not here to write, shoot, design and code for our audience… then who are we doing it for?

If you write a perfectly crafted, exquisitely shot and artfully arranged multi-part public service piece about your local government abusing it’s power but no one read it, **did you every really serve the public**?

(Snarky comment: If we’re not serving the public, and we’re not making money then what are we doing?)

Obviously the business of journalism can’t be summed up as “get lots of readers, get lots of page views” — niche products, advertiser interest and the long tail all serve to make it more complex than that.

However, if you can only know one thing shouldn’t **every journalist** in a newsroom know about **their audience**?

In my twisted brain it’s easier to express the idea in code:

while profit > 0:
    knowledge = conduct_user_research()
    newspaper.staff.improve(based_on=knowledge)
    profit = newspaper.revenue - newspaper.cost

    if profit = None or knowledge = None:
        raise GameOverMan
Posted in Business, Journalism, Management | 2 Comments

Edwards dropped out of the race to get VP nod?

I’m definitely no political junky, and I’ve definitely watched too mutch [West Wing](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_West_Wing) but something hit me while watching an [Onion TivoCast](http://www.theonion.com) about John Edwards in New Hampshire.

(Okay my Tivo watchlist has a tendency to pile up, so sue me…)

Anyway, I’m thinking that John Edwards bowed out of the race, earlier than expected, in an attempt to guarantee a Vice Presidential spot on the ticket.

* He campaigned on issues and didn’t get into mudslinging about his other Democratic nominees so there’s no [bad blood](http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-demcampaign30jan30,1,2355034.story)
* He can bring youth and being a man (sad that some voters will require this) to Clinton’s campaign if she gets the nomination
* He can reinforce the youthful image Obama is going for, and bring whiteness (again, sad that some voters will require this).
* And no matter what, he can represent the South for either campaign

But, what do I do know…

Posted in Politics | Comments Off on Edwards dropped out of the race to get VP nod?