It’s stupid, on purpose

Anyone who works in the Internet biz, especially us newspaper types, should check out World of Ends.

This is a great article by Doc Searls and David Weinberger, that really gets at what the Internet is and what stupid (not in a good way) mistakes companies keep making.

One that’s particularly applicable to the online newspaper industry is this:

Perhaps companies that think they can force us to listen to their messages — their banners, their interruptive graphic crawls over the pages we’re trying to read — will realize that our ability to flit from site to site is built into the Web’s architecture. They might as well just put up banners that say “Hi! We don’t understand the Internet. Oh, and, by the way, we hate you.”

I’ve talked before about how easy it is for your users to leave your site. One click of the close button and… poof!

It takes more effort to take the newspaper and drop it on a stack, that I’ll recycle once it falls on my fiancee and I hear her cries for help, than it does to close a browser window.

It’s about the users, stupid!

Give them what they want, when they want, how they want. Whatever your business model, this is the key to success.

For the newspaper business, happy users means more return visits, users who are more likely to pay attention to ads (if they’re ads that users want, when they want them, and how they want them…), which means more revenue.

Posted in Business, Management, Technology, Web design | Comments Off on It’s stupid, on purpose

It’s my browser, not yours

And I’ll decide when to open links a new window, thank you very much.

E-media Tidbit’s Steve Outing gets it wrong when he suggests that papers should send readers to off-site links in a new window.

His suggestion that the new window be sized small enough to indicate that the original site is underneath is a valiant effort to combat the usability problem of breaking the back button, but it introduces another.

To open a window with a specified size, you’d have to use Javascript, which would mean the href would probably point to “#”, while an onClick event would be set.

For users who have grown tired of windows opening out of nowhere and who probably now open links in new windows (via context-menus) or in new tabs, they’ll get a blank window and be forced to go back and use the Javascript link provided.

Remember, it’s my browser, not yours.

By not linking off-site, or by doing so with annoying new windows, sites are merely generating ill will among their users.

Consider how little effort it takes to copy an off-site link and paste it into the URL field if I want to leave your site (or the even smaller amount of effort it takes to close the browser).

To those digital naysayers who are now plotting to remove any off-site URLs from their content, (linked or unlinked), consider how little effort it’ll take me to leave your page, go to Google and search for the company or site you mentioned but didn’t provide a URL for.

So ask yourself, if it’s so easy to leave your site when you’re making it difficult then why try and stop them from leaving? Instead, provide plain ol’ simple “a href’s” and generate some goodwill among your users.

Happy users means more users, which means happy advertisers.

Posted in Web design | 2 Comments

Rage, horrible rage

If anyone else gets a G5, that they don’t want, please contact me, before you desecrate it.

Posted in Technology | Comments Off on Rage, horrible rage

Advertisers not getting the message

I read Trek Today, and TrekBBS — I’m a nerd, let’s move on.

They both have annoying, moving, spining, jumping, singing, spitting, yelling ads that annoy me and give me a bad impression of the company the ad is for (are you listening advertisers?!).

I have Mozilla, it can block images and do many other things. So without shame, I block the annoying ads and am left with the text ads and the Amazon.com partnership ads — both tasteful and relevent.

But now, the advertisers have fired back. This is the first time I’ve seen this, it’s a text ad in an iframe with an annoying background image, which Mozilla can not block.

I like, TrekBBS, and I want to support it — but not by being annoyed.

Now, you’d think the advertising network, UGO, would have gotten the message.

Let’s see: X Page views with Y annoying ad placements, where X < Y means people are disabling your annoying ads.

Not the text ads, not the non-annoying banners, just the moving, spinning, coma-inducing, swirling, etc. ads.

What should we do? Listen to our user’s demands for tasteful, relevent ads, or… wait, I’ve got it, try and find a way around the browser’s blocks.

By jove, that’s it! Our users must really want annoying ads, and those malicious browser makers are bent on ruining us… yes, that’s it.

UGO, et al have I got a deal for you.

Posted in Web design | Comments Off on Advertisers not getting the message

The Duke of URLs

Whitespace has a good discussion going on about directory structure and thinking about it in advance.

Directory structure is important to system administrators, URL structure is important to designers.

But, Chris, you say, aren’t the two inherently linked? Won’t /www/news/metro23.html have to be http://www.site.com/news/metro23.html?

There was a dark time, when that was true, but then there was mod_rewrite, and it was good.

Without going into too much detail, you can use mod_rewrite to abstract the file structure from the URL structure. So, for instance, a one-off page like /contact.html could easily become the URL http://www.site.com/contact/.

Admittedly it would become excessive to have to rewrite every single URL on your site, so doing some basic planning between the file structure and your URLs at the outset is good.

But mod_rewrite could easily let you fix small differences between the file system and the URL.

For instance on a site I’m working on for my employer, I wanted to keep all the text-based content (not photo galleries or video, etc.) in a folder called /articles. This included columns which lived on the filesystem in /articles/columns/. But for URL purposes I wanted columns to be a top-level section of the site so a bit of mod_rewrite magic makes /columns/ point to /articles/columns/.

Where mod_rewrite can really shine, though, is in taming ungainly CMS generated URLs, like this one:

http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/B00005JLF5/qid%3D1072559511/
sr%3D11-1/ref%3Dsr%5F11%5F1/002-5343588-7541623

A bit of mod_rewrite could turn that into something like this:

http://www.amazon.com/dvd/ds9/one

But, don’t take my word for it. (Hat tip)

Posted in Web design | 1 Comment